![]() It was left to Gore, who presided over the count as president of the Senate, to gavel down the objections from his fellow Democrats. 14: Electoral College delegations meet and. Non-safe harbor matching and nonelective contributions. Last day of the plan year following the plan year in which the contribution is being made. It is mandated by Congress that results are considered conclusive six days before electors meet. Safe harbor matching and nonelective contributions. When Florida's electoral votes, decisive in Bush's victory, reached Congress, several Black House members protested, but no senators joined in. 8: 'Safe Harbor' deadline for final results. Whether there was time to conduct a recount by then "is a matter for the state courts to determine," Breyer wrote. In his dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer said the deadline that really mattered was the day on which the Electoral College was scheduled to meet. Bush, then the Texas governor, the next day. ![]() Vice President Al Gore conceded the race to George W. The Supreme Court shut down Florida's state-court-ordered recount because the safe harbor deadline was approaching. Gore case after the 2000 presidential election. The safe harbor provision played a prominent role in the Bush v. What is really being challenged right now is our capacity to play by those rules," Foley said. The unwillingness of Trump and his supporters to concede is "dangerous because in an electoral competition, one side wins, one side loses and it's essential that the losing side accepts the winner's victory. If that were to happen, both chambers would debate the objections and vote on whether to sustain them.īut unless both houses agreed to the objections, they would fail. Brooks would need to object in writing and be joined by at least one senator. Specifically, a safe harbor plan is generally exempt from ADP/ACP testing enabling the plans highly compensated employees to maximize elective deferrals, i.e. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., has said he will challenge electoral votes for Biden on Jan. 8 deadline, Foley said.Īlready one member of the House of Representatives, Rep. The first deadline facing Trump is the safe harbor date established in federal law following the disputed election of President Rutherford B. In any case, Biden would still have more than the 270 votes he needs even without Wisconsin's.īut lawmakers in Washington could theoretically second-guess the slate of electors from any state that misses the Dec. Biden electors still will meet in Madison on Monday to cast their votes and there's no reason to expect that Congress won't accept them. Missing the deadline won't deprive Wisconsin of its 10 electoral votes. Judge Stephen Simanek, appointed to hear the case, has acknowledged that the case would push the state outside the electoral vote safe harbor. Like the others, the lawsuit does not appear to have much chance of succeeding, but because it was filed in accordance with state procedures for challenging election results, "it's looking to me like Wisconsin is going to miss the safe harbor deadline because of that," said Edward Foley, a professor of election law at Ohio State University's Moritz School of Law. Most of his campaign's lawsuits in state courts challenging those Biden victories have been dismissed, with the exception of Wisconsin, where a hearing is scheduled for later this week. He has refused to concede, made unsupported claims of fraud and called on Republican lawmakers in key states to appoint electors who would vote for him even after those states have certified a Biden win.īut Trump's arguments have gone nowhere in court in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Read Whet’s full report on why this final surge will be brutal.The attention paid to the normally obscure safe harbor provision is a function of Trump's unrelenting efforts to challenge the legitimacy of the election. Since then, no region has seen anything like the conditions once seen in the Northeast, but seven months later, the picture in the country as a whole could be worse. In April, 60 percent of deaths occurred in the Northeast no other region accounted for more than 17 percent. ![]() deaths the South, 35 percent the West, 15 percent the Northeast, 14 percent. ![]() In the same period, starting in November, the Midwest represented 37 percent of U.S. In this surge, then, the share of deaths is more evenly distributed across the country. In July, only the South exceeded 100 deaths per million. In April, during the first surge, only two regions, the Northeast (602 deaths per million) and the Midwest (138 deaths per million), were above that 100-deaths-per-million line the West was at just 50 deaths per million. The West had 94 deaths per million people. From the beginning of November through yesterday, there were more than 100 COVID-19 deaths per 1 million people in the Northeast, the South, and the Midwest (which, at 267 deaths per million, had the highest rate in that period), according to COVID Tracking Project data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |